A bare wooden pantry shelf being swept clean, a hand-broom at the edge — the house being emptied of the final crumb of leaven.

The Old Leaven and the New

Share

For seven days each year, the Feast of Unleavened Bread calls for clearing every trace of leaven out of the house — swept from the cupboards, gone — and eating unleavened bread in its place. The rest of the year, leavened bread is eaten without a second thought.

Where the feast is kept, that clearing has long been read as putting sin out of the life. But once leaven stops meaning sin and starts meaning what it actually is — teaching, doctrine, a whole way of seeing that works through a person the way leaven works through dough (see Does Leaven Really Mean Sin?) — the seven days turn strange. The clearing isn’t scrubbing sin off a life. It is the emptying-out of an entire way of seeing.

What comes out

And notice the instruction: not some of the leaven. All of it. “A little leaven leavens the whole lump,” so the whole lump has to go — every corner of the house. The old understanding: not only the parts we would gladly be rid of, but the parts we would keep — the framework we were raised inside, the certainties we read the rest of Scripture through.

All of it, out — and not because none of it was true. Some of it may well be. But good knowledge mixed into the wrong lump takes the lump’s character, and there is no clean way to pick it back out. The faculty that would do the sorting is made of the very stuff to be sorted; it cannot stand outside the lump to judge it. So the whole thing goes, the true with the false, because the one holding them can no longer tell them apart.

That is a harder and stranger thing than “behave for a week.” You can white-knuckle seven days of good conduct. We cannot, by deciding to, empty ourselves of the way we see. Which is why, when it comes, it tends to feel less like housekeeping than like a death: the old self and its certainties taken out, and not by us. (What forms in the cleared-out place is its own matter — see What Is A New Lump?.)

Why only a week

This also settles the small thing that never fit “leaven is sin”: if the feast were about putting sin out, and we put it out for seven days, what happens on the eighth — do we start sinning again? The question dissolves once we see what is actually being pictured. There is a season to clear the old and a season for the new; the days do not suspend misbehavior for a week, they walk a process. The clearing is not the whole of it. It is the making-room.

From unleavened to leavened

Because the feast year does not end in an unleavened house. Watch where it goes. The Days of Unleavened Bread give way, at the wave sheaf, to a count — seven weeks — that ends in a feast whose closing detail most of us have noticed and never reconciled: the firstfruits brought to God are two loaves baked with leaven (see The Feast of LEAVENED Bread). The old leaven swept out in the spring; a new leaven risen by Pentecost. Not unleavened forever — emptied, so that a new understanding could be worked all the way through, and offered back full.

So leaven was never the enemy. The old leaven was — and only because it had to come out to make room for the new. The question the whole movement puts to us is the one the first feast already asked: not whether we are leavened, but which leaven — and whether we will let the old go, to receive it.

None of this is the kind of thing you get talked into. If the old reading is worn too deep to set down in an afternoon, don’t force it — leave it on the back burner, and go look at the feast again, with leaven meaning what it means. The rest comes the way real seeing comes: not by being argued, but after something has made room. This only points. The road runs on from here, through the feasts that follow.

See also:

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *