A hand seen from the side, one finger pointing outward while the other fingers curl back toward the palm.

The Only Clean Place

Share

We have said two things in these pages that can look like they cannot both be true. One: that man is the unclean creature — measured by the law’s own tests and coming up short on every line. The other: that under Peter’s sheet the voice was clear — “What God has made clean, do not call common,” and Peter’s own words after, “I should not call any person common or unclean” (Acts 10:28). So which is it? Are we unclean, or are we forbidden to say so?

The quickest way out is to pick one and let the other go. Either no one is really unclean, and we overstated the whole thing — or people are unclean, and the label stands, Peter or no Peter. But each of those quietly discards something true. So look again, slower. The voice to Peter does not say no one is unclean; it says do not call a person unclean. The seeing and the saying are not the same act, and the whole knot loosens on the difference.

What Peter was in danger of was not noticing uncleanness. It was standing over another man with the word, as though the uncleanness were another’s and not Peter’s own. Scripture shows that stance, and shows it undone. Two men go up to pray: one says, “God, I thank you that I am not like other men”; the other will not so much as lift his eyes — “God, be merciful to me, a sinner.” It is the second, not the first, who goes home justified (Luke 18:9-14). The one who accused from a clean seat did not hold the seat. “You who judge practice the same things” (Romans 2:1). The forbidden thing was never the diagnosis; it was the diagnosis turned outward as a verdict, by one who quietly exempts himself.

And this is not special pleading about a single word. The same voice that warns, “whoever says, ‘You fool!’ will be liable to the hell of fire” (Matthew 5:22), turns and calls the Pharisees “blind fools” (Matthew 23:17); Paul writes, “O foolish Galatians!” (Galatians 3:1); and Proverbs names the fool on nearly every page. The word was never the offense. The offense is the contempt behind it — handed to a brother from a seat we only imagine is above his.

So why may we not call a man unclean? Not because he isn’t. We are — all of us; that is the ground we stand on together, and the measure fell on us before it fell on anyone else. (Uncleanness was never even a verdict to begin with — a condition, not a crime.) The reason is twofold. First, the accusation is a lie about the one making it: to point “unclean” outward is to pretend we are standing somewhere clean, when we are the same creature, failing the same tests. And second, the deeper one: cleanness was never ours to give or take away. “What God has made clean, do not call common” (Acts 10:15). The word belongs to God because the washing belongs to God. To call another man unclean is to pick up a gavel that was never in our hands, and to forget the only One who makes anyone clean. We are not to call men unclean — not because we were never unclean, but because God is the one who makes us clean.

The two truths were never at war, then. Man is unclean — every one of us, the one writing this first of all. And it is exactly because that is true of all of us that none of us is in any position to hand the word across to someone else. There is only one clean place to say “unclean,” and it is in the mirror. We say it there, honestly — and then the one thing that follows is to turn to the One who does the washing. That turning is the whole of it. It always was.

See also:

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *